Back to Blog
Industry 7 min read

SOC 2 in 2026: What's Changed and What to Expect

The SOC 2 landscape is evolving in 2026: AI system coverage, supply chain controls, and rising auditor scrutiny. What's new and how to prepare.

Key Takeaways
  • Auditors are increasingly asking about AI system controls and data handling in 2026.
  • Supply chain security (CC9.2) scrutiny has increased following major third-party breaches in 2024–2025.
  • The AICPA is developing guidance on AI and SOC 2 — expect formal criteria additions in coming years.
  • Penetration testing frequency expectations are rising — annual may no longer satisfy rigorous enterprise buyers.
  • Indian SaaS companies are seeing SOC 2 become a baseline rather than a differentiator in US enterprise sales.

The State of SOC 2 in 2026

SOC 2 adoption has accelerated significantly over the past four years. The percentage of B2B SaaS companies with SOC 2 Type II reports doubled between 2020 and 2024, driven by enterprise procurement requirements. In 2026, SOC 2 is increasingly a baseline credential rather than a differentiator.

The Trust Services Criteria framework itself has not been formally revised since 2017, but auditor interpretation and enterprise buyer expectations have evolved significantly. Several areas are receiving heightened attention in 2026 audits.

AI System Controls

Companies using AI/ML systems in their products are facing new auditor questions: How is training data protected? What controls prevent AI systems from leaking confidential customer data in model outputs? How are AI model changes managed (change management for model updates)? How are AI system failures detected and responded to?

The AICPA has published preliminary guidance on AI and Trust Services Criteria, noting that existing criteria (particularly CC6 for access control, CC7 for monitoring, and CC8 for change management) apply to AI systems. Expect more formal AI-specific guidance in the 2026–2027 timeframe.

Practical implication for 2026: if your product incorporates AI/ML, brief your auditor on how AI systems are included in your SOC 2 scope. Document training data access controls, model deployment change management, and output monitoring. Auditors who are not experienced with AI systems may ask broad questions — having clear documentation positions you well.

Supply Chain Security Scrutiny

Following significant third-party and software supply chain breaches in 2024–2025, SOC 2 auditors are applying significantly more scrutiny to CC9.2 (vendor risk management) than in previous years. Auditors are looking for: comprehensive vendor inventories that include software dependencies (not just SaaS tools), evidence of annual reviews for all Tier 1 vendors, and specific controls around CI/CD pipeline security.

Software supply chain controls that are increasingly tested: signed commits and artifact signing, dependency vulnerability scanning (Snyk, Dependabot, GitHub security alerts), and Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) for key product components.

Indian SaaS companies with complex dependency chains (common in AI/ML products) should invest time in documenting their software supply chain controls before auditor fieldwork.

Rising Enterprise Buyer Expectations

Enterprise procurement security reviews are evolving beyond "do you have SOC 2?" to "what does your SOC 2 report say about [specific area]?" Security questionnaires increasingly reference specific SOC 2 criteria by number and ask for evidence beyond the report itself.

Penetration testing: enterprise buyers are increasingly asking for penetration test reports alongside SOC 2. Annual testing is becoming the minimum expectation; some large enterprises require quarterly or semi-annual testing for their highest-risk vendors.

DPDP Act awareness is growing among US and European enterprise buyers with Indian vendor relationships. Procurement teams are beginning to ask about DPDP Act compliance alongside SOC 2.

SOC 2 in the Indian Market

The Indian B2B SaaS market crossed an important threshold in 2025–2026: SOC 2 became a near-universal requirement for Indian companies targeting US Fortune 500 enterprise contracts. Companies without it are routinely disqualified at the procurement stage.

Simultaneously, Indian domestic enterprise buyers are beginning to request SOC 2 in addition to (or instead of) ISO 27001 for SaaS vendors, reflecting the increasing US-alignment of Indian enterprise procurement practices.

The DPDP Act enforcement timeline is adding a second compliance layer for Indian companies. Companies that have built SOC 2 programmes are well-positioned to layer DPDP compliance on top efficiently.

How to Prepare for 2026 Expectations

If you have existing SOC 2: review your vendor register for software dependency coverage, document AI system controls if relevant to your product, and ensure your penetration test is current (within 12 months).

If you are starting SOC 2 in 2026: build supply chain controls (dependency scanning, SBOM) into your initial programme. Address AI system controls from the start if your product uses AI. Factor DPDP Act into your scope discussion with your auditor.

For all companies: brief your auditor on how your programme addresses supply chain and AI system controls before fieldwork begins. Proactive communication prevents auditor questions from turning into exceptions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are there new SOC 2 criteria being added in 2026?
No formal criteria additions have been announced by the AICPA for 2026. However, auditor interpretation of existing criteria is evolving, particularly around AI systems, software supply chain, and cloud-native architectures. Watch the AICPA's publication of "Points to Consider" documents for emerging guidance.
Does my SOC 2 programme need to cover my AI/ML models?
If AI/ML systems are part of the service you provide to customers (in scope for your SOC 2), then yes — your controls must address how those systems are secured, changed, monitored, and how customer data they process is protected. If AI is only used internally (e.g. for internal analytics), it may be out of SOC 2 scope with appropriate documentation.
How is software supply chain security different from vendor management?
Vendor management (CC9.2) covers the SaaS tools and service providers your company uses. Software supply chain security covers the code dependencies (npm packages, pip libraries, Docker base images) that comprise your product. Both are within SOC 2 scope, but they require different controls: vendor management needs reviews and DPAs; supply chain security needs dependency scanning and artifact integrity verification.
Is SOC 2 still worth pursuing in 2026 given how common it has become?
Yes, emphatically. SOC 2 having become a baseline means not having it disqualifies you — it is table stakes. The market has not moved past SOC 2 to a 'next thing.' SOC 2 Type II remains the primary security credential for US B2B SaaS sales in 2026.
What is the AICPA guidance on AI and SOC 2?
The AICPA has published 'Points to Consider When Evaluating an Entity's Use of Artificial Intelligence' — preliminary guidance noting how existing Trust Services Criteria apply to AI systems. It is not a new category of criteria but rather an interpretive guide for applying existing CC criteria to AI contexts.

Automate your compliance today

AuditPath runs 86+ automated checks across AWS, GitHub, Okta, and 14 more integrations. SOC 2 and DPDP Act. Free plan available.

Start for free